Love never fails

Charles de Foucauld was a French Catholic priest and hermit who lived among the Muslim Tuareg people in the Sahara in Algeria. He was shot dead at the age of 58 in an assassination attempt in 1916. His life and his extraordinary writings led to the founding of a number of religious communities inspired by his example, including the Little Brothers of Jesus.

Fr. Charles lived in radical simplicity and poverty, and sought to witness to Christ among his Muslim neighbors through friendship and service. He was adamant that loving others in Christ’s name is not a clever means to the end of achieving their conversion, but is rather the very end itself. I have come to believe this subtle point is monumental in its implications. Only loving others as its own end and not as a means to some additional end manifests Christ, whose love for us is unconditional.

This does not mean one hides faith when loving another, as people in a highly secularized and pluralistic society often imagine, but rather that loving God and one’s neighbor is the sole goal of all faith.

Such an evangelizing commitment to love avoids what a convert to Catholicism once said of her experience of her coworkers who belonged to a nondenominational church: “I always felt that they were super nice to me and wanted to be my friend so they could make me a Christian, and that they would stop hanging out with me if I didn’t. It felt kinda like Amway.”

It also avoids Christ’s own startling indictment of the Pharisees and scribes’ proselytizing hypocrisy:

Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for you traverse sea and land to make a single proselyte, and when he becomes a proselyte, you make him twice as much a child of hell as yourselves.

A proselyte is a convert, and passionate zeal for converts can mask all kinds of disordered loves. In fact, in our Catholic tradition ‘proselytizing’ has negative connotations of manipulative, dishonest or disingenuous methods of gaining converts.

A final point. There are as many ways to evangelize as there are Christians who evangelize. To reduce evangelization to a formulaic method that is mass produced and copied by all for effective results can undermine the integrity of each Christian life as a unique manifestation of the infinite richness of Christ. This, by the way, is the genius of Pope Francis’ teaching in Gaudete et exultate.

How we are each to witness to the Gospel in our own place is a call that must be daily discerned by each person. In this age of mass-produced programs and methods that contain “silver bullet” promises of one-size-fits-all effectiveness and success — ‘just add water’ and you will make converts, be healed, be happy, be holy — this point cannot be emphasized enough.

Fr. Charles’ way was itself unique to its time and uniquely suited to life lived among his Muslim neighbors. He said of his own way, “It is not necessary to teach others, to cure them or to improve them; it is only necessary to live among them, sharing the human condition and being present to them in love.”

As Pope Francis, who canonized Fr. Charles in 2022, said:

Saint Charles de Foucauld, a figure who is a prophecy for our time,
bore witness to the beauty of communicating the Gospel
through the apostolate of meekness:
considering himself a “universal brother” and welcoming everyone,
he shows us the evangelizing power of meekness, of tenderness.
Let us not forget that God’s style is summarized in three words:
closeness, compassion and tenderness.
God is always near, he is always compassionate, he is always tender.
And Christian witness must take this road:
of closeness, compassion and tenderness.
And this is how he was, meek and tender.
He wanted everyone he met to see, through his goodness,
the goodness of Jesus.
Indeed, he used to say he was a “servant to someone much better than I.”
Living Jesus’ goodness led him to forge fraternal bonds of friendship
with the poor, with the Tuareg, with those furthest from his mentality.
Gradually these bonds generated fraternity, inclusion, appreciation of the other’s culture.
Goodness is simple and asks us to be simple people,
who are not afraid to offer a smile.
And with his smile, with his simplicity,
Brother Charles bore witness to the Gospel.
Never by proselytism, never: by witness.
One does not evangelize by proselytism,
but by witness,
by attraction.

8 comments on “Love never fails

  1. lelocke1 says:

    Thank you for this post, Tom-so much richness to it and a great reminder to me when I feel like I need to “do more” to convince people of God’s love. I simply need to act in a way that demonstrates that love without any hidden agenda.

    • LL

      thank you so much for always reading here and commenting, it means so much to me. If people knew your story, they would know that you live precisely what I say. Many blessings, my dear friend.

  2. jessicasouva20 says:

    Tom, I have been returning to your wonderful newsletter recently, it is feeding my soul, and I thank you so much for all that you put into it. May you be continually blessed and protected in your ministry. ~ Jessica Souva

    • Jessica, it’s so good to see your name here. Thank you so much for your comment and for reading here. I am so honored to be a part of your life. Please tell your husband, I said hello! Godspeed.

  3. Jennifer says:

    Your post hatched this earworm (thankfully). Enjoy!

    • Jennifer, I listened, and now you’ve done it to me! It’s in my head permanently! I have never heard that, so thank you so much for introducing me to it. I love songs that put the scripture to music. Always grateful that you are part of this blog. Godspeed.

  4. SF says:

    Beautiful as always. Any advice on what I feel like is a fine line between living among others/sharing the human condition/being present to others in love verses ending up being a part of the sins of others/becoming a part of a disobedient community?

    • This is a great question, thank you! So much to say. I will keep it simple. The key with how to preserve oneself in the midst of a very diverse and sometimes resistant or hostile world is to remain grounded in a community of faith, remain grounded in the life of prayer and spiritual discipline and have relationships of encouragement and accountability that can help you negotiate the challenges, gain wisdom from failures, come to understand your own limits and the possibilities that exist for loving a wide variety of people from within your own deep convictions of faith. Pope JP2 famously said, “mission flows from communion,” which essentially means mission requires grounding in the vertical communion with God and the horizontal communion of the faithful with one another. Open to the world. In dialogue with the world. Witnessing to the world. Consecrating the world. Loving the world even and especially in the face of rejection or apathy. The Vatican II document “Gaudium et spes” was all about how the church is to abide in the modern world in a fruitful way.

      There are many ways of thinking about the relationship between the community of faith and the larger world in which Christians abide, many models of that relationship.

      In many ways, Pope Francis’ Evangelii Gaudium is a spelling out of a way through this complex navigation. It is a treasury of insight into this balance of communion and mission.

      There are many lay movements that seek to create these kinds of communities (Communion and Liberation, Focolare, Neo-Catechumenal Way), Community of Sant’Egidio, or even the wonderful Lafayette Lay/Religious mixed community of the Community of Jesus Crucified – so so many of them out there. But in the US, it is primarily the Parish that is the central community, centered around the Eucharist, that is to be the primary center for communion to form into communities.

      The Benedict Option of Dreher became popular a while ago as a model for forming communities separated from but still related to the larger culture. It set off a storm of debate and discussion and gave birth to a series of other “Options.” I personally like the style of the Jeremiah option once proposed by Samuel Goldman: https://www.theamericanconservative.com/what-would-jeremiah-do/
      In all of this, it is always hard. The whole Christian tradition is this story! Standing in the middle, in the tension, between assimilation and sectarian separation.

      I once made this comparison in class on the ways this tension can be negotiated. They all have something to say. But the “transformer” is, I believe, the truest Catholic way.

      “New Testament models of kulturkampf”
      Pharisees (insolation)
      Sadducees (assimilation)
      Zealots (imposition)
      Essenes (isolation)
      Jesus (incarnation)

      “Richard Niebuhr models”
      Christ against culture
      Christ of culture
      Christ above culture
      Christ and culture in paradox
      Christ the transformer of culture

      A book I have recently enjoyed for the STYLE of engaging challenging cultural contexts is this: https://www.amazon.com/Defend-Faith-Withou-Ivereigh-Austen/dp/1612785387/

      Hope this is of some use! Thanks for reading. God bless you!

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.